Want to gain admission to a course but your qualifications do not meet the entry requirements?
You may be able to use a Recognition of Prior Experiential Learning (RPEL) process
Many people have asked for more information on Recognition of Prior Experiential Learning (RPEL). I have prepared a presentation that explains the process and how it works in National College of Ireland. Comments are welcome.
Wednesday, September 1, 2010
Wednesday, August 18, 2010
Leaving Certificate Results
Today's top story is the issuing of results to almost fifty eight thousand (58,000) Leaving Certificate students.
This event is widely reported in national newspapers, radio and television news. Much of the coverage deals with the failure rates for different subjects. Of special interest is the success rates for Science, Engineering Technology and Mathematics- the so called STEM subjects. It is reported that some 4,300 students have failed Mathematics.
The availability of a talented young workforce is often cited as part of the attraction of Ireland as a location for inward economic investment. Poor results do not help the international perception of our education system. Employers are increasingly looking for critical thinking, creativity and problem solving skills in their new recruits. It is reasonable to ask to what extent the results of the Leaving Certificate Exam may be taken as an indication of a person's future potential as an innovative thinker and an effective contributor to the knowledge economy.
Take for example the substantial cohort of young people who have failed Mathematics. Are we justified in writing off the potential of these people as college students, future inventors, knowledge workers, scientists, entrepreneurs and innovators? I feel not.
Letter to Sam (a fictional character representative of the 4,300):
Dear Sam,
This event is widely reported in national newspapers, radio and television news. Much of the coverage deals with the failure rates for different subjects. Of special interest is the success rates for Science, Engineering Technology and Mathematics- the so called STEM subjects. It is reported that some 4,300 students have failed Mathematics.
The availability of a talented young workforce is often cited as part of the attraction of Ireland as a location for inward economic investment. Poor results do not help the international perception of our education system. Employers are increasingly looking for critical thinking, creativity and problem solving skills in their new recruits. It is reasonable to ask to what extent the results of the Leaving Certificate Exam may be taken as an indication of a person's future potential as an innovative thinker and an effective contributor to the knowledge economy.
Take for example the substantial cohort of young people who have failed Mathematics. Are we justified in writing off the potential of these people as college students, future inventors, knowledge workers, scientists, entrepreneurs and innovators? I feel not.
Letter to Sam (a fictional character representative of the 4,300):
Dear Sam,
Today you got your results and I guess it came as no surprise that you are one of the 4,300 students who failed mathematics. It must have been very disconcerting to listen to media reports on the importance of Mathematics for our future economy. Surely, you must be thinking that it will be very hard to get a job or go to college. What now are your career options and prospects for the future?
Sam I'm not going to say that that none of this counts and that the results of your Leaving Certificate are of no consequence - that's certainly not the case! What I do say is that when you put things in perspective you have much more choice and more potential that you think.
Be very careful about accepting labels, especially labels that you give to yourself, at this stage in your life. You may wish to say I'm no good at maths! - perhaps this is something you've always believed about yourself and now you feel vindicated, you were right all along and your Leaving Cert results prove it. Well, that may be the case but it is also likely that other factors are in play. Have you ever heard of a self-fulfilling prophecy? Perhaps it was your own belief about being no good that caused you to apply little effort or energy to the subject. Of course, once you fall behind with Maths its harder and harder to catch up. So you need to genuinely ask yourself is it that you fell behind and simply need time to catch up or do you have a more fundamental problem with Maths.
Sam what are you good at? Is it that you are good at sport or do you know about cars, or fashion or music? Think about how you became good. How did you develop these skills? It took time and persistence even tenacity, lots of practice and most especially, you were interested and believed you could progress. This is how you became a skilled footballer (musician, mechanic, hairdresser and so on).You know other people who wish to be as good as you are and you might even say look its easy. Well to you its easy but it may be very daunting for other people - just like Maths is for you.
So you might ask is there really anybody who is genuinely no good at Maths or is it all about the perceptions, teachers and opportunities? The answer is complex - I mean yes and no - Maths generally involves abstract thinking and many people have a generalised difficulty with this form of thinking. The best way to explain abstract thinking is to compare it with its opposite - concrete thinking.
Here's an example, a family of four are preparing to go on a motoring holiday and your task is to load the boot of the car. As you might expect some people have brought two suitcases and what's more the car has a very small boot and the cases come in all shapes and sizes. Now in order to complete the task do you start to load and move each case testing where it will fit best (concrete thinking) or do you work out a scheme in your head as to how the whole lot will fit (abstract thinking)? In this example each approach has merit. Some people are 'knackey' they are good with their hands and they can visualise how things will fit together. This spacial ability is closely related to mathematical ability it is a really useful skill. However, some people use it in concrete situations and never really seem to be able to apply it in abstract form. In my opinion people who have good spacial ability have the potential to be good at Maths but they don't always fulfil this potential.
Regardless, Sam you need to know that you will be learning throughout your life and the setback today may be an opportunity in disguise. State exams are just one measure of the potential of an individual and the Maths exam is just one aspect of that measure. To survive and thrive in this world we need to be intelligent in a multitude of different ways - we need language skills, social skills, kinaesthetic (movement) skills, awareness of nature, spacial skills and yes, mathematical and logical skills (see Howard Gardner's works on multiple intelligence). Build on your strengths - society needs people with all these capacities and everyone has something to offer.
Best wishes for the future
Leo
Sunday, June 13, 2010
Viktor Frankl: Man's Quest for Meaning
If ever you think your life is miserable and you start to get downhearted then I have a book I recommend you read "Man's Quest for Meaning" by Victor Frankl.
Frankl was born in Vienna in 1905 and even before the outbreak of World War 2 was an accomplished academic and psychotherapist. He was also a Jew and, along with his entire family, was imprisoned in a concentration camp. Man's Quest for Meaning documents his personal experiences of Auschwitz and other camps. Only he and his sister survived everyone else who mattered to him: his wife, parents, siblings and friends were killed. A good summary of his life and work is provided by Dr. C. George Boeree here.
After the war, Frankl reestablished his career and produced this remarkable book which soon gained a substantial readership and acclaim.
I remember my reluctance to read the book - I was afraid I would find it depressing, after all, life in a concentration camp what could be uplifting about that? The opposite was the case, I was genuinely uplifted and this is is precisely the point that comes through in the text. If, even in the most forlorn circumstances, in the depths of hopelessness and the most inhumane conditions, if even there and then, people seek to bring meaning into their lives, they strive to build things, to organize, establish relationships and cling to ideas - this is surely an uplifting insight on our very existence.
Recently I found this web clip of Frankl - watch and listen to what he says here and read the book. You'll find it difficult to moan about our own trivial challenges in the future.
Frankl was born in Vienna in 1905 and even before the outbreak of World War 2 was an accomplished academic and psychotherapist. He was also a Jew and, along with his entire family, was imprisoned in a concentration camp. Man's Quest for Meaning documents his personal experiences of Auschwitz and other camps. Only he and his sister survived everyone else who mattered to him: his wife, parents, siblings and friends were killed. A good summary of his life and work is provided by Dr. C. George Boeree here.
After the war, Frankl reestablished his career and produced this remarkable book which soon gained a substantial readership and acclaim.
I remember my reluctance to read the book - I was afraid I would find it depressing, after all, life in a concentration camp what could be uplifting about that? The opposite was the case, I was genuinely uplifted and this is is precisely the point that comes through in the text. If, even in the most forlorn circumstances, in the depths of hopelessness and the most inhumane conditions, if even there and then, people seek to bring meaning into their lives, they strive to build things, to organize, establish relationships and cling to ideas - this is surely an uplifting insight on our very existence.
Recently I found this web clip of Frankl - watch and listen to what he says here and read the book. You'll find it difficult to moan about our own trivial challenges in the future.
Sunday, April 25, 2010
TPACK: Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge
What makes a great teacher? This is a difficult but important question for education at all levels. One way to get to the answer is to think about individual teachers that you have encountered in your life. Somehow we all know great teachers when we meet them and of course, we certainly know poor teaching when we come across it.
I am not one of those who believes that teaching is a natural gift and some people are born to be teachers and others not. Most great teachers that I know work constantly on their own development as educators. A capacity for great teaching can be gained through experience and reflection and I believe that anybody who wants to be a great teacher can become a great teacher.
What then are the ingredients for successful teaching? Well, thinking about the teachers in my life, I know that teachers need to have a very good knowledge of a content area. I did science in college and I have some strong views on how we should teach science based on my own experiences as a student. Previously I commented on the lecture by Carl Wieman, the Nobel laureate in Physics. Wieman argues against the over reliance of explaining in science teaching - he suggests that we start with realistic goals and facilitate individual discovery through activities "doing science" rather than listening to it.
I attended my first lecture in Physics at UCD in 1977 I remember the lecturer Rev Dr Tom Burke asking the class what constitutes a force such as gravity. We were used to the school definitions such as the Newton's gravitational force = M1 by M2 over R squared times G (the gravitational constant) and offered this as the answer. But Fr Burke asked further "sure that's the formula but what is the gravitational force? What's happening for example, between the Earth and the Moon that manifests itself as gravity?" We were stumped! When we left the lecture we were none too happy - our old world of Physics as the subject of certainty (you only needed to know the formula) was turned upside down. We were not given the answer. We were forced to think. I'm thinking about it still. Welcome to science. Fr Burke was a great science teacher.
So, good knowledge of a content area is certainly a characteristic of an effective teacher. However, this on its own is not sufficient. Here is what Jean Piaget had to say about subject matter knowledge:
This may involve asking questions that encourage new thinking as occurred in my first Physics lecture. It may also involve identifying threshold concepts (Meyer & Land 2006), aspects of a subject area that open up understanding, and presenting these in ways that are accessible to students.
In a recent conversation a friend referred to a teacher as great with analogies and metaphors. A stock of appropriate analogies, metaphors, examples, illustrations and models is perhaps part of the PCK of any teacher.
Casey, L., Bruce, B. C., Martin, A., Shiel, G., Brown, C., Hallissy, M., et al. (2009). Digital literacy: New approaches to participation and inquiry learning to foster literacy skills among primary school children. Report funded by the Department of Education and Science. Available from http://hdl.handle.net/2142/9765.
Piaget, J. (1962). Play, Dreams and Imitation in Childhood. New York: Norton.
Shulman L S. (1986). Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching Educational Researcher, Vol. 15, No. 2, (Feb., 1986), pp. 4-14 American Educational Research Association
Meyer J. H. F. & Land R. 2006 (Eds.) Overcoming Barriers to Student Understanding: threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge. Routledge − Taylor & Francis Group, London and New York
Mishra P, Koehler MJ. 2006 Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge. Teachers College Record Volume 108, Number 6, pp. 1017–1054
I am not one of those who believes that teaching is a natural gift and some people are born to be teachers and others not. Most great teachers that I know work constantly on their own development as educators. A capacity for great teaching can be gained through experience and reflection and I believe that anybody who wants to be a great teacher can become a great teacher.
What then are the ingredients for successful teaching? Well, thinking about the teachers in my life, I know that teachers need to have a very good knowledge of a content area. I did science in college and I have some strong views on how we should teach science based on my own experiences as a student. Previously I commented on the lecture by Carl Wieman, the Nobel laureate in Physics. Wieman argues against the over reliance of explaining in science teaching - he suggests that we start with realistic goals and facilitate individual discovery through activities "doing science" rather than listening to it.
I attended my first lecture in Physics at UCD in 1977 I remember the lecturer Rev Dr Tom Burke asking the class what constitutes a force such as gravity. We were used to the school definitions such as the Newton's gravitational force = M1 by M2 over R squared times G (the gravitational constant) and offered this as the answer. But Fr Burke asked further "sure that's the formula but what is the gravitational force? What's happening for example, between the Earth and the Moon that manifests itself as gravity?" We were stumped! When we left the lecture we were none too happy - our old world of Physics as the subject of certainty (you only needed to know the formula) was turned upside down. We were not given the answer. We were forced to think. I'm thinking about it still. Welcome to science. Fr Burke was a great science teacher.
So, good knowledge of a content area is certainly a characteristic of an effective teacher. However, this on its own is not sufficient. Here is what Jean Piaget had to say about subject matter knowledge:
“Every beginning instructor discovers sooner or later that his first lectures were incomprehensible because he was talking to himself, so to say, mindful only of his point of view. He realizes only gradually and with difficulty that it is not easy to place one’s self in the shoes of students who do not yet know about the subject matter of the course.”
(Piaget 1962 p5)
Piaget suggests that it is not easy to place one's self in the shoes of the learner. Just because we know something doesn't mean that we can teach it. We use the term pedagogy to refer to knowledge about learning in others. A good teacher needs to have pedagogical as well as content knowledge.
Lee Shulman (1986) suggested Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK) as a special kind of content knowledge important for teaching. There are two aspects of pedagogic knowledge - a kind of general or generic understanding of learning and teaching that is applicable across all subject areas and a second subject specific pedagogic knowledge. This is knowledge as to the teach-ability of aspects of a subject.
This may involve asking questions that encourage new thinking as occurred in my first Physics lecture. It may also involve identifying threshold concepts (Meyer & Land 2006), aspects of a subject area that open up understanding, and presenting these in ways that are accessible to students. In a recent conversation a friend referred to a teacher as great with analogies and metaphors. A stock of appropriate analogies, metaphors, examples, illustrations and models is perhaps part of the PCK of any teacher.
Often PCK is represented as the intersection of two domains of knowledge pedagogy and content. This representation is useful for teachers and those involved in the professional development of teachers.
Lee Shulman's contribution has certainly helped researchers by providing a conceptual framework that encompasses the domains of knowledge associated with effective teaching. However, more recently it has been suggested that this framework needs to be extended to include the domain of technological knowledge.
Mishra and Koehler (2006) have put forward the proposition that today's teachers also require knowledge in a third domain - technology. Their representation extends Shulman's PCK to become TPCK also called TPACK. They emphasise the value of the integration of these bodies of knowledge for teaching rather than considering each as a separate domain.
In this model, knowledge about content (C), pedagogy (P), and technology (T) is central for developing good teaching. However, rather than treating these as separate bodies of knowledge, this model additionally emphasizes the complex interplay of these three bodies of knowledge.
Mishra and Koehler 2006 p1025
For example, it is not advocating "technology" per se be considered rather, it is what technology can do to facilitate learning. The argument is that the technologies of today offer new possibilities that were not considered when Shulman first put forward PCK.
For me, I'm not so sure of the value of separating technology as a domain. As I mentioned above, part of the PCK for a good teacher is a stock of analogies, anecdotes and illustrations. All of these are tools - intellectual tools - that are used to facilitate student understanding.
Through each generation the art and craft of teaching has evolved to accommodate the cultural and social milieu of the time. Despite what we often think there is nothing special about today, this time and these new technologies. Human cognition has evolved over thousands of generations and the essential mechanisms for learning are the same whether technology enhanced or not. In the Digital Literacy in Primary Schools (DLIPS) project we found that teachers were using strategies that involved project learning and technology. Yes of course their are some technical skills required, and of course we will need to provide additional training and professional development for teachers at all levels as technology evolves and makes new strategies and practices possible. However, my argument is that this should always be considered as part of the pedagogical content knowledge base of the teacher rather than a new domain.
To add technology as a separate domain of competence has some advantages (as argued by Mishra and Koehler) but their are disadvantages: we may over-estimate the technology rather than the intellectual tool that the technology makes possible (film-makers tell stories - it is the story telling that has pedagogic value); we may alienate teachers who do not use technology (these may be great teachers also!) and finally, there is a danger of commercial influences driving technology into pedagogy.
Regardless, I set out to answer the question "what makes a great teacher?". For me, knowledge (PCK), an ability to motivate, a capacity to set achievable goals, to provide students with constant feedback on performance and a learner-centered approach to instruction - these are the ingredients of a great teacher.
References
Casey, L., Bruce, B. C., Martin, A., Shiel, G., Brown, C., Hallissy, M., et al. (2009). Digital literacy: New approaches to participation and inquiry learning to foster literacy skills among primary school children. Report funded by the Department of Education and Science. Available from http://hdl.handle.net/2142/9765.
Piaget, J. (1962). Play, Dreams and Imitation in Childhood. New York: Norton.
Shulman L S. (1986). Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching Educational Researcher, Vol. 15, No. 2, (Feb., 1986), pp. 4-14 American Educational Research Association
Meyer J. H. F. & Land R. 2006 (Eds.) Overcoming Barriers to Student Understanding: threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge. Routledge − Taylor & Francis Group, London and New York
Mishra P, Koehler MJ. 2006 Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge. Teachers College Record Volume 108, Number 6, pp. 1017–1054
Tuesday, April 20, 2010
SITE Conference
I recently attended the SITE Conference in San Diego, California. SITE stands for the Society for the Information Technology and Teacher Education and it is one of the biggest conferences in this field. Chip Bruce and I had submitted a paper based on the Digital Literacy in Primary Schools (DLIPS) project.
I attended many other sessions and it was very useful to catch up with developments across the field. One thing that struck me is the use (perhaps overuse) of short abbreviations to describe areas of interest. Thus a session might be described as dealing with TPAC for SET in K-12 - decoded this means Mhisra and Koehler's (2006) Technological, Pedagogical And Content Knowledge (TPACK - worth a future blog!) for Science Engineering and Technology (SET) subjects in primary and secondary schools (K-12).
The presentation associated with our paper is posted below. The basic idea is an exploration of the connection between learning as inquiry and new digital media. Essentially we argue for a new approach to pedagogy based on the Inquiry Cycle and making the most of digital media capabilities to initiate, sustain and enhance that cycle.
It's not so much that the vision of learning as inquiry is new - it is in fact a well established idea but that the new media of today make it possible to realistically achieve in a school setting. See my previous blogs on An Organic Approach to Teaching and How Digital Media Make it Possible and my discussion and links on the Inquiry Cycle in my Why We Blog post for further insights.
I attended many other sessions and it was very useful to catch up with developments across the field. One thing that struck me is the use (perhaps overuse) of short abbreviations to describe areas of interest. Thus a session might be described as dealing with TPAC for SET in K-12 - decoded this means Mhisra and Koehler's (2006) Technological, Pedagogical And Content Knowledge (TPACK - worth a future blog!) for Science Engineering and Technology (SET) subjects in primary and secondary schools (K-12).
The presentation associated with our paper is posted below. The basic idea is an exploration of the connection between learning as inquiry and new digital media. Essentially we argue for a new approach to pedagogy based on the Inquiry Cycle and making the most of digital media capabilities to initiate, sustain and enhance that cycle.
It's not so much that the vision of learning as inquiry is new - it is in fact a well established idea but that the new media of today make it possible to realistically achieve in a school setting. See my previous blogs on An Organic Approach to Teaching and How Digital Media Make it Possible and my discussion and links on the Inquiry Cycle in my Why We Blog post for further insights.
Digital literacy in primary school site presentation 2010
View more presentations from Leo Casey.
Mishra P, Koehler MJ. 2006 Teachers College Record Volume 108, Number 6, pp. 1017–1054
Mishra P, Koehler MJ. 2006 Teachers College Record Volume 108, Number 6, pp. 1017–1054
Monday, April 5, 2010
Earthquake!!
Maire and I have just experienced an earthquake! We are here in San Diego for the weekend after the SITE conference. We had just been on a boat tour of the harbour and at some time before I was due to pick up a rental car. We decided to go to Borders bookshop to have some coffee and relax. Unusually I ordered frozen coffee and a cake - as they often do the server took my name and said he'd call me when it was ready. I heard "Leon" and presumed it was for me and made my way to the counter.
Woo! Woo! Woo! the earth began to shift. Maire got very flustered. I was a bit calmer. But the experience lasted maybe 30 seconds. It's a very strange feeling. I experienced it once before in Athens in 1980. This was more sustained.
The intercom in the store asked us to leave. Contrary to what we're supposed to do I made sure to collect my rucksack. People were very orderly as we all left the building. Outside we stood for several minutes while those with iphones checked their apps for updates. I remembered I had a camera and took some footage posted below. You get a sense of the nervous laughter and the very professional manner in which the Borders manager informed us of what was happening.
For the rest of the day people here were a bit on-edge. Yes the Californians may be used to tremors but this was big enough. We watched some of the news channels and realised that there were several quakes. At time of writing no one seems to have been injured.
Woo! Woo! Woo! the earth began to shift. Maire got very flustered. I was a bit calmer. But the experience lasted maybe 30 seconds. It's a very strange feeling. I experienced it once before in Athens in 1980. This was more sustained.
The intercom in the store asked us to leave. Contrary to what we're supposed to do I made sure to collect my rucksack. People were very orderly as we all left the building. Outside we stood for several minutes while those with iphones checked their apps for updates. I remembered I had a camera and took some footage posted below. You get a sense of the nervous laughter and the very professional manner in which the Borders manager informed us of what was happening.
For the rest of the day people here were a bit on-edge. Yes the Californians may be used to tremors but this was big enough. We watched some of the news channels and realised that there were several quakes. At time of writing no one seems to have been injured.
Friday, March 5, 2010
"Christ Deliver Us"
A new play at the Abbey Theatre written by Thomas Kilroy inspired by Inspired by German dramatist Frank Wedekind’s 1891 masterpiece Spring Awakening.There is an archetypal story that can be found in folklore, fairytales and mythology and it recurs again and again. It is the 'coming of age' narrative whereby the young gain wisdom, overcome adversity and become adults. Thus, each culture reproduces. The young learn and adapt, society is newly interpreted and modified and each generation inherits and subsequently passes on the values and norms of their parents.
This process of 'take-over' from generation to generation is fundamental to the survival of a culture. Hence so many stories and the high value placed on the wisdom therein. We see this in The Godfather, Harry Potter and even the story of Moses - the storyline is similar in each case - an alternative life beckons for a short while but eventually one's true nature wins out and the inherited core values are embraced.
There is a particular variation of this theme which we all find disturbing and is at the root of Kilroy's new play. What if "there's something rotten" in society? What if it's a monster? Who will inherit a culture of moral cowardice, oppression and miss-shapen values? Stories such as Sophocles' Oedipus, and Shakespeare's Hamlet deal with this variation - they are stories of doom. Tragedies. A rotten society, a deviant culture must not be passed on - the situation for the young is hopeless.
Christ Deliver Us is not about Ireland, the 50's or religious oppression - it is a variation of an age-old story. It is a warning. Each person must interpret the world and carryies a responsibility to be true to their own values. When this is not possible, as was the case for the young characters in this play, the situation is unsustainable. A society that hands over moral authority to others - in this case the church - cannot survive. There is no inheritance.
In the play we find three main characters at the boundary of adulthood. Each in their own way experiences the stifling of ambition and the suppression of their individuality. We find a society in crisis where even the likeable mother (Winnie's) and father figures (the Canon) are bereft of courage that they fail to assert their moral authority.
This is a society where the voice of reason ( Fr Seamus) is quite literally stifled - incapable of being heard. Against these odds their is no possibility of a happy ending - the young are trapped and left with just questions unanswered and wishes unfulfilled. Here too we are reminded of the primal reality that sits immediately below the surface of any society - hence the savagery of what we see. This is the consequence of the malfunctioning society - the ironic price of ignoring the 'real' is that it wells up uncontrollably - the play contains scenes of rape, masturbation and physical violence.
Christ Deliver Us resonates long after the performance.Congratulations to Thomas Kilroy, Wyane Jordan and the Abbey for such a superb production.
Christ Deliver Us! by Thomas Kilroy from Abbey Theatre on Vimeo.
Tuesday, March 2, 2010
"Grade Inflation" Getting Everything Wrong
This is a really important issue for Ireland and for everyone in the education sector. It is vital that get a clear understanding of what the problem is and what we need to do to rectify it.
First of all, the problem we need to solve is not "Grade Inflation" and it would be a huge mistake if we were all to get in a muddle comparing the numbers of first class honours' degrees or 600 point Leaving Certs in the past few years.
Just like all measures based on our social circumstances, such as the spending power of the average weekly wage or the average life-expectancy, over time we should expect to see a gradual improvement in similar measures of quality and achievement in our education system.
Today, we are educating more people to a higher standard than ever before and I will be surprised if the emperical evidence from the soon-to-be released study will not show this to be the case.
But I do not believe we should be congratulating ourselves - there is a problem and a new challenge and we need to get to the heart of it.
Let me use one source Dr Craig Barrett, former CEO and Chairman of Intel and a frequent visitor to Ireland:
It is a not sufficient for the Department of Education and Science to look to the State Exams Commission (note "exams" not "assessment") to produce year-on-year comparisons of Leaving Cert grades - why don't we look at what the Leaving Cert is really measuring - mostly memory, recall and strategic learning. Genuine problem-solving and creative thinking are not nurtured and not sufficiently recognised.
Similarly, in third level we are certainly guilty of over rewarding students who do not ask questions, suggest alternatives, write critically or challenge the norms of society.
This is the real threat! In short, it's not that we are giving too many high grades in exams, it's that we are not measuring what we should be measuring.
Certain skills are more important for competitive and connected workplaces - these include inquiry, problem solving, technical and scientific skills, critical thinking, research, collaboration, presentation and good writing.
These skills need to be nurtured and measured at all levels of education. This is the real challenge.
First of all, the problem we need to solve is not "Grade Inflation" and it would be a huge mistake if we were all to get in a muddle comparing the numbers of first class honours' degrees or 600 point Leaving Certs in the past few years.
Just like all measures based on our social circumstances, such as the spending power of the average weekly wage or the average life-expectancy, over time we should expect to see a gradual improvement in similar measures of quality and achievement in our education system.
Today, we are educating more people to a higher standard than ever before and I will be surprised if the emperical evidence from the soon-to-be released study will not show this to be the case.
But I do not believe we should be congratulating ourselves - there is a problem and a new challenge and we need to get to the heart of it.
Let me use one source Dr Craig Barrett, former CEO and Chairman of Intel and a frequent visitor to Ireland:
"Your primary and secondary schools are only average," he said. "It is no longer good enough to be average. You have to be excellent at what you do ... at the end of secondary school your young people are average. Your education system is being challenged by improvements in the rest of the world. Things have changed, the educational attainment of other countries have been increasing, and that increases competition for attracting investment."Source: http://www.examiner.ie/opinion/columnists/matt-cooper/for-ireland-to-make-the-grade-we-need-radical-education-reform-111903.html#ixzz0h0o2hsCxBarrett is providing us with a global perspective and he, rightly in my opinion, points to the progress made by other countries. Later in the same interview Barrett lays down the challenge:
"It is possible for Ireland to continue to be successful, but you have to worry about the capability of your workforce and what it does," he said. "Why not a race to the top? Why not have more capability and jobs where you can add value? Increased capability and education is where you increase value."Now, let me make plea: let's not get ourselves in a flap over grade inflation or comparisons between institutions. Let's talk about what really matters - quality of teaching and quality of assessment.
Later"Teachers should not be just competent but masters," he argued. "How do you excite children about a subject? By having high-quality teachers. You must treat education like any quality service you aim to provide. Your employees have to be good and get paid on the basis of performance."Source: http://www.examiner.ie/opinion/columnists/matt-cooper/for-ireland-to-make-the-grade-we-need-radical-education-reform-111903.html#ixzz0h0qGJr4J
It is a not sufficient for the Department of Education and Science to look to the State Exams Commission (note "exams" not "assessment") to produce year-on-year comparisons of Leaving Cert grades - why don't we look at what the Leaving Cert is really measuring - mostly memory, recall and strategic learning. Genuine problem-solving and creative thinking are not nurtured and not sufficiently recognised.
Similarly, in third level we are certainly guilty of over rewarding students who do not ask questions, suggest alternatives, write critically or challenge the norms of society.
This is the real threat! In short, it's not that we are giving too many high grades in exams, it's that we are not measuring what we should be measuring.
Certain skills are more important for competitive and connected workplaces - these include inquiry, problem solving, technical and scientific skills, critical thinking, research, collaboration, presentation and good writing.
These skills need to be nurtured and measured at all levels of education. This is the real challenge.
Labels:
Assessment,
Education,
Skills Mathematics,
Teaching
Sunday, February 28, 2010
Help needed to set up My Learning (dot ie)
I want to make a social space for people to tell My Learning stories
I rent some server space and own a url called www.mylearning.ie - it's a leftover from my days in business.
I think this is a useful web address especially if used to discuss and promote learning.
My interest is in adult learning and in particular, people who strive to take up learning for the first time - perhaps since their school days.
It would be great to establish an on-line community of learners - a place where people can share experiences, encourage others and tell their stories.
Central to the idea is the notion of engagement and participation - what I mean is a space where people will feel part of something and wherein everyone is encouraged to participate.
The most important characteristic is that new and novice Internet users will be especially welcome. Often people are self-conscious when making contributions as they may feel that everyone else is more experienced.
The idea is that members of the community who have had similar experiences and well be well-placed to help the new users.
There's nothing especially new in this idea - this is, in essence, the kind of social networking approach that is typical of web 2.0. But what is different is that this site will focus on learning and will be very open to people of all ages.
So I'm looking for ideas and offers of help - especially welcome at this stage will be people willing to participate in the following groups:
A technical group - to specify the web design and the best technologies to promote active participation.You can contact me directly at leocasey@mac.com or leave a comment for this blog (my comments are moderated).
A marketing group - to specify how to get the message out to as many people as possible.
An activity group - to specify what people can do while participating and engaging with My Learning.
Tuesday, February 23, 2010
Why We Blog
Yes! With some help from the marketing department of the best college in Ireland (click here to find out). I can proudly report that
Leo's Learning Blog has been nominated for the Irish Blog Awards in the category of Best Specialist Blog.
Well, surely this is something to blog about!
Yes! but before I get too carried away I note that there are many excellent blogs in this category including Eugene's Blog, Deryk Thormy's Blog and Jimmy Hill's Blog.
So what's going on with blogging?
What are we all doing and more importantly why do people blog?
As you might expect I have a learning theory that might explain, in part, what may be happening.
I refer you the work of John Dewey (1859 - 1952) the American educationalist and philosopher and the further insights of Professor Chip Bruce a "master blogger" of many years, a great scholar and a friend of mine.
Chip and others have developed the notion of an Inquiry Cycle model of learning based on 4 basic human impulses identified by John Dewey (for a fuller treatment I recommend you read Chips Bruce's work here).
The basic idea is that we all have a tendency to learn through a cyclical process involving Ask, Investigate, Create, Discuss and Reflect - as in the diagram below (source Chip Bruce):
I contend that this is precisely what we seem to be doing when we blog.
We start by asking some kind of question, in my case for example:
Can we measure learning?
Top Ten Insights on Learning
The question "ask" or inquiry begins with the writer but gets passed on to the reader.
Next we "investigate" to get new insights and often source and build on the ideas of others. And, as a natural consequence, we seek to build on the ideas of others - this is the "create" part of the cycle.
With new insights and ideas its only natural (literally) that we seek to share, communicate and "discuss" with others - hence all this blogging.
Finally we we think back on the experience and "reflect" and this, in turn, initiates the cycle again.
We live in a complex and challenging and for me, this blog helps me to sort things out - it is part of my inquiry, my way of making meaning and my learning.
Monday, February 22, 2010
These days this is my favorite book.
I have blogged previously on one of Bateson's "Metalogues" - look here to review. Bateson's metalogues are styled as father daughter conversations.
Here's another one I would like to consider - this is a short extract from the opening:
Mealaogue: About games and being seriousThrough this conversation Bateson goes on to introduce many ideas about how we "play" together. The core of this idea is not new - there are always unspoken rules associated with how we communicate.
Daughter: Daddy, are these conversations serious?
Father: Certainly they are.
D: They're not a sort of game you play with me?
F: God forbid ... but they are a sort of game we play together.
D: Then they're not serious!
For me, the most useful question is: "What's going on here?". Ask yourself this question when attending meetings, participating in decisions or even writing (as I am now). Frequently, we interpret a situation at an immediate and shallow level. Often, what's really going on can only be appreciated by interpreting what's being said along with the unspoken rules of the encounter.
Friday, February 19, 2010
Learning and Motivation
Motivation is used as a catchall term to describe how people are moved to act in a certain manner or direction. In everyday use there is a tendency to conceptualise motivation as mono-dimensional we often seek the motive for why a person acted in a particular way.
Single explanations for people’s actions or goals are often inadequate and misleading. People tend to justify past-behaviour and will report a retrospective rationale. However, models of motivation, if they are to be of use, need to provide predictions of future behaviour.
The term motivation is used in many different contexts and can mean different things in everyday language. Motivation is often used to describe a level of commitment even energy such as during half time at a football match where a manager gives a team a motivational talk to ‘lift’ the team for the second half.
In such uses of the term motivation is likened to a psychic booster; one could imagine an internal M meter reading either high or low. This meaning of motivation is not limited to physical activity - people might say “coming up to the exam I became really motivated and studied for five hours every day”. It’s even the case that certain speakers at business conferences describe themselves as ‘motivational speakers’. However important it is to be ‘psyched up’ and however interesting it might be to study motivation as degree-of-determination or drive toward a particular goal - this is not the aspect of motivation that is of interest here.
What I wish to focus on is the decision to set goals, the ‘why’ of action and in particular, decisions to learn. In order to explain most human behaviours a fuller spectrum of influences needs to be appreciated. Serious consideration of the concept of motivation leads to a realisation that motivation is both complex and multi-dimensional.
Single explanations for people’s actions or goals are often inadequate and misleading. People tend to justify past-behaviour and will report a retrospective rationale. However, models of motivation, if they are to be of use, need to provide predictions of future behaviour.
The term motivation is used in many different contexts and can mean different things in everyday language. Motivation is often used to describe a level of commitment even energy such as during half time at a football match where a manager gives a team a motivational talk to ‘lift’ the team for the second half.
In such uses of the term motivation is likened to a psychic booster; one could imagine an internal M meter reading either high or low. This meaning of motivation is not limited to physical activity - people might say “coming up to the exam I became really motivated and studied for five hours every day”. It’s even the case that certain speakers at business conferences describe themselves as ‘motivational speakers’. However important it is to be ‘psyched up’ and however interesting it might be to study motivation as degree-of-determination or drive toward a particular goal - this is not the aspect of motivation that is of interest here.
What I wish to focus on is the decision to set goals, the ‘why’ of action and in particular, decisions to learn. In order to explain most human behaviours a fuller spectrum of influences needs to be appreciated. Serious consideration of the concept of motivation leads to a realisation that motivation is both complex and multi-dimensional.
Ryan and Deci (2000) refer to motivation in terms of the ‘energy, direction, persistence and equifinality of activation and intent’. Equifinality, a term borrowed from systems theory, in this case meaning that the same result can be arrived at through many different paths or trajectories.
A dictionary definition such as in Colman’s A Dictionary of Psychology (Colman, 2006), describes motivation as a driving force or forces responsible for the initiation, persistence, direction, and vigour of goal-directed behaviour. This introduces the notion of goals and goal-directedness within an individual. Where learning is the goal we may, within the framework of the above definition, regard motivation-for-learning as having a cuasal relationship with learning oriented behaviours.
A dictionary definition such as in Colman’s A Dictionary of Psychology (Colman, 2006), describes motivation as a driving force or forces responsible for the initiation, persistence, direction, and vigour of goal-directed behaviour. This introduces the notion of goals and goal-directedness within an individual. Where learning is the goal we may, within the framework of the above definition, regard motivation-for-learning as having a cuasal relationship with learning oriented behaviours.
Ahl (2006) summaries different theoretical orientations gleaned from her extensive literature review of learning motivation. Ahl argues that the concept of motivation is itself questionable and she challenges three assumptions that are often implicit in many of the theories: first that such an entity as motivation exists; second, that it resides with the individual; and third, that motivation causes behaviour (Ahl, 2006). Ahl argues the large variety of definitions of motivation from the literature contribute to the questionability of the motivation construct.
Wlodkowski (1999) seems to support this:
Wlodkowski (1999) seems to support this:
We have invented a word to label this elusive topic –motivation- but even its definition continues to baffle the most scholarly of minds.
(Wlodkowski, 1999: 1)
Ahl also points out that motivation is socially and psychologically construed and that operational measures such as self-report surveys are mearly reinforcing research-generated concepts. For example, to ask people to report on their need for achievement is to create the notion of a ‘need for achievement’.
Learning decisions are therefore important sites of investigation and can provide powerful insights for educators and policy makers on the development of skills and competence in future populations.
References
Ahl, H. (2006). Motivation in adult education: a problem solver or a euphemism for direction and control? International Journal of Lifelong Education, 25(4), 385 - 405
Colman, A. M. (2006). A Dictionary of Psychology: Oxford University Press.
Cyr, A. V. (1999). Overview of Theories and Principles Relating to Characteristics of Adult Learners: 1970s-1999. Access ERIC: FullText (070 Information Analyses). Florida.
Knowles, M. S. (1978). The adult learner : a neglected species (2d ed.). Houston: Gulf Pub. Co., Book Division.
Merriam, S. B., Caffarella, R. S., & Baumgartner, L. (2007). Learning in adulthood : a comprehensive guide (3rd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being, American Psychologist (Vol. 55, pp. 68-78).
Wlodkowski, R. J. (1999). Enhancing adult motivation to learn : a comprehensive guide for teaching all adults. The Jossey-Bass higher and adult education series.
Wednesday, January 20, 2010
The School
The recent 3-part RTE series "The School" broke new ground in terms of education and television.
What takes place in schools is both familiar and mysterious to most adult viewers.
Our school experiences resonate throughout the entire span of our lives and, for many, learning identity forged during teenage, years remains fixed and unchallenged long after our initial schooling is complete.
Every society looks to young people to reproduce and reinvent itself for the future. Put simply, organised societies that are good at education will survive and outlast societies that fail to do so. Schools and education are our biggest investment apart from health systems.
Strangely, unless you are currently an active participant in the school system, there is little visibility of what's going on. We seldom get an opportunity to compare schools today with the schools of our childhood. This issue is more important that a simple need to satisfy our curiosity: we need to know about how much has changed, the improvements, new ways of teaching, a new understanding of learning, and new thinking on what should take place in schools.
Since we left school we have grown and developed into who we are today - few of use would say that we have not radically changed since the day we left school. And yet, we often assume that the school system that we left so long ago has remained fixed and unchanged. Obviously this is not the case.
And this is why "The School" as a television series did us all a great service. It provided an opportunity to 'open our minds', to see and to experience contemporary school life.
The school principal, Eamon Gaffney is a good friend of mine. Eamon, the staff and students of St Peters Dunboyne showed great courage and self-confidence in facilitating the making of these programmes. I remember Eamon saying that he felt that this story needed to be told "people need to know about schools of today, the breath of learning and the holistic approach to education".
"The School" has captured something that's important to us all.
What takes place in schools is both familiar and mysterious to most adult viewers.
Our school experiences resonate throughout the entire span of our lives and, for many, learning identity forged during teenage, years remains fixed and unchallenged long after our initial schooling is complete.
Every society looks to young people to reproduce and reinvent itself for the future. Put simply, organised societies that are good at education will survive and outlast societies that fail to do so. Schools and education are our biggest investment apart from health systems.
Strangely, unless you are currently an active participant in the school system, there is little visibility of what's going on. We seldom get an opportunity to compare schools today with the schools of our childhood. This issue is more important that a simple need to satisfy our curiosity: we need to know about how much has changed, the improvements, new ways of teaching, a new understanding of learning, and new thinking on what should take place in schools.
Since we left school we have grown and developed into who we are today - few of use would say that we have not radically changed since the day we left school. And yet, we often assume that the school system that we left so long ago has remained fixed and unchanged. Obviously this is not the case.
And this is why "The School" as a television series did us all a great service. It provided an opportunity to 'open our minds', to see and to experience contemporary school life.
The school principal, Eamon Gaffney is a good friend of mine. Eamon, the staff and students of St Peters Dunboyne showed great courage and self-confidence in facilitating the making of these programmes. I remember Eamon saying that he felt that this story needed to be told "people need to know about schools of today, the breath of learning and the holistic approach to education".
"The School" has captured something that's important to us all.
Sunday, January 3, 2010
Really Useful Websites on Learning and Teaching
As a follow-up to my previous blog on the Top Ten Insights on Learning I would like to provide a list of web sources and resources that may act as good places to start with insights on learning and teaching.
I'll try to give a brief description of each and why it makes the cut for me.
Starting Points: Aggregation Sites
Theory into Practice (TIP)
Greg Kearsley has put together an excellent resource that deals with a wide variety of learning theories. This is an excellent starting point and it will give the beginner a good appreciation of the breath of theories and their practical applications.
Emtech's Learning Theories
This is another excellent starting point with a comprehensive list of learning theory orientations. What I like about this list is that each section is authored by a different person and you can cite each as an individual resource.
Martyn Ryder's Instructional Design Models
Martyn Ryder's very comprehensive listing of instructional design and learning theory resources -this site is well maintained, comprehensive and deals with an wide expanse of theoretical orientations.
Learning and Teaching
Teaching Tips Index
This is another great starting point for lot's of interesting exploration. The index is compiled by the faculty development team at Honolulu Community College. I've looked at many of these teacher development sites and I have to say this is certainly one of the best!
Angles on Learning
James Atherton's resource for called: An introduction to ideas about learning for college, adult and professional education - brings together ideas about learning for college, adult and professional education. Great piece of work!
The ETL Project
This project sought to identify evidence-based good practice in teaching-learning environments for a range of undergraduate courses.
National Survey of Student Engagement If you are genuinely interested in what goes on in college classrooms then this site dealing with an extensive US research project is a good place to start.
Doing What Works
This is a US Government site that promotes research-based educational practices. This resource is particularly relevant for primary and second level teachers.
Learning Research
ERIC
The Education Resources Information Center - a search-able database containing loads of journal articles and other resources on education and learning.
Education and Policy
European Commission
The Education and Training Directorate of the European Commission - a good starting point for EU and national policy documents.
I'll try to give a brief description of each and why it makes the cut for me.
Starting Points: Aggregation Sites
Theory into Practice (TIP)
Greg Kearsley has put together an excellent resource that deals with a wide variety of learning theories. This is an excellent starting point and it will give the beginner a good appreciation of the breath of theories and their practical applications.
Emtech's Learning Theories
This is another excellent starting point with a comprehensive list of learning theory orientations. What I like about this list is that each section is authored by a different person and you can cite each as an individual resource.
Martyn Ryder's Instructional Design Models
Martyn Ryder's very comprehensive listing of instructional design and learning theory resources -this site is well maintained, comprehensive and deals with an wide expanse of theoretical orientations.
Learning and Teaching
Teaching Tips Index
This is another great starting point for lot's of interesting exploration. The index is compiled by the faculty development team at Honolulu Community College. I've looked at many of these teacher development sites and I have to say this is certainly one of the best!
Angles on Learning
James Atherton's resource for called: An introduction to ideas about learning for college, adult and professional education - brings together ideas about learning for college, adult and professional education. Great piece of work!
The ETL Project
This project sought to identify evidence-based good practice in teaching-learning environments for a range of undergraduate courses.
National Survey of Student Engagement If you are genuinely interested in what goes on in college classrooms then this site dealing with an extensive US research project is a good place to start.
Doing What Works
This is a US Government site that promotes research-based educational practices. This resource is particularly relevant for primary and second level teachers.
Learning Research
ERIC
The Education Resources Information Center - a search-able database containing loads of journal articles and other resources on education and learning.
Education and Policy
European Commission
The Education and Training Directorate of the European Commission - a good starting point for EU and national policy documents.
Friday, December 25, 2009
Top Ten Insights on Learning
It's the time of year for reviews. I call it the season of the "top tens": we have the top ten songs of 2009, the top ten sporting moments, the top ten films and so on.
I have decided to step on the band wagon and am now pleased to present my Top Ten Insights on Learning.
Here we go:
- Learning is constructed
- People are curious
- We learn best in social settings
- Much adult learning is child's play
- We have a Learning Identity
- Meet the Digital World
- Adults learn what they want to learn
- Learning can be additive or transformative
- We learn throughout life
- We strive to be all that we can be
1 Learning is constructed
The best analogy is that of a tree with many branches.
Learning has nothing to do with transmission of knowledge - it about personal construction.
Educators who recognise this focus on process rather than output and encourage students to make their own meaning rather than reproduce the work of others.
2 People are curious
We can be both mentally and physically curious. We have evolved our higher order thinking skills because our curiosity has provided a competitive advantage on this planet.
Curiosity is at the root of learning - to make learning happen provide conditions where curiosity is aroused.
3 We learn best in social settings
No matter how clever or knowledgeable a person is - very little can be achieved alone.
When we learn our instinct is to share and communicate with others.
Students who work together through group work will learn much more than the task at hand: they will have to listen, discuss, debate, concede, collaborate, co-operate and share. These are really usefull skills.
4 Much adult learning is child's play
I said above that people are curious both mentally and physically. Curiosity can be very dangerous if it is left unregulated.
I could be curious about what its like to walk on the central partition of the motorway, manage an international bank or pilot a 747 but I'll never do these things.
However, through play and imagination I can experience these actions and their consequences.
Teachers should let students play - this is also important in 3rd level: role play, simulations, gaming, problem-solving, apprenticeship and peripheral participation can be regarded as adults at play.
5 We have a Learning Identity
We all have a Learning Identity and I have written about this in a previous blog post.
In my own research on how adult's go about learning digital skills late in their careers I found that Learning Identity loomed large whenever educational endeavour was considered. I would ask "why do you want to learn computer skills?" and people would respond with "well I was no good in school..."
Perhaps it's because society places such a high value on schooling and educational qualification that those who have had difficult experiences in school feel so inadequate when it comes to learning in later life.
It's as if what they learned in school was that they were not good learners.
Educators and trainers should not underestimate learning identity. It's not just about praising and encouraging (although we should do this all the time) it's about being aware of social comparison, fear of humiliation and genuine exam anxiety. The big message should be - this is not like school.
6 Meet the Digital World
Your first thought might be that the digital world is "out there" in the places where people are using technology to make things happen. But what I want to talk about is the Digital World that's "in here" - I mean inside your mind!
We all build the world in our mind and through this process we organise, ascribe our values, assumptions, unquestioned beliefs and preconceived patterns of thought about aspects of the world.
For me its the Digital World but for other people it may be the world of the literate, of the wealthy, of the workers, of the young or of the future.
The important point is critical awareness. That is the learning task: to be cognisant of our assumptions, prejudices and patterns of thought.
7 Adults learn what they want to learn
This should be written on the wall of every training room and college classroom.
Learning decisions are often neglected. I find this a fascinating area of inquiry: why do people choose to learn at a particular point in time?
We can pack our children into a classroom and somehow get away with telling them what they need to know but there is no way this will work with adults.
Connecting usefulness and application is integral to the learning task for adults.
8 Learning can be additive or transformative
One of the characteristics of transformative learning is that it it involves loosing something (and this can be disconcerting) and rebuilding or putting something new in its place.
I think that transformative learning can take place at a societal level also. Imagine the upheavals caused by Calileo's assertion that the Earth orbits the Sun or when Darwin described the Origin of the Species. It wasn't so much that we rejected the new ideas but we also had to face the reality that to do so involved moving away from preexisting, more comfortable, beliefs.
Transformative learning can take people outside their comfort zone and challenge 'the way we've always thought about things'. This is not always an easy experience.
One example of transformative learning that I frequently encounter is the process of college students moving beyond a positivist view of the world to become more comfortable with uncertainty, different perspectives and and awareness of their own subjectivity.
Teachers who challenge students to think differently, to appreciate other perspectives and to self-reflect on practice will create conditions for transformative learning. When students argue and critique we know we have accomplished.
9 We learn throughout life
We tend to compartmentalise our short existence into a series of stages each with its own tasks and challenges. We are born and grow in childhood developing of motor, language, thinking and communications skills. As teenagers, we build our identity and later we are tasked with our partner relations, parenting and success in the workplace. Later still, we face the challenges of ageing and the fragility of our bodies and finally we face the fact that we are mortal.
We need to learn as we go - there is no point of arrival where we have all the we need to confront the challenges ahead. This is why learning is often described as a journey, this journey parallels the journey of life.
People of all ages look for meaning in their life, learning is one way to give meaning. Senior learning is often regarded as "nice" - in fact it is much more, it is essential. Lifelong learning is also learning for a long life!
10 We strive to be all that we can be
One way to think about this is in terms of a desire to be competent no matter what the field of activity.
This is not the same as wanting to be good at everything. To strive to be 'all that you can be' is to take account of opportunity, capability and circumstance.
But what you need to be good at is: who you are - you need to be the best "put your name here" possible. As we grow this guides our approach to learning and life.
We learn to be all that we can be.
Thursday, December 3, 2009
Lord Mayor's Commission on Employment
This is an inspired and necessary goal for the City Council and tackling unemployment or, to put it more positively, creating employment is essential for the future well-being of all who live and work in our city.
The Lord Mayor's Commission has set up working groups on a number of key areas: (1) Unemployment & Employment, (2) Business, Entrepreneurship & Finance, (3) Education, Skills and Training, and (4) Volunteering & the Social Economy.
The commission have invited submissions and I have copied below my own contribution on the area of Education, Skills and Training.
Dublin City of Learning
Let's stop and think and about learning. No I don't mean schooling, or formal training or the pursuit of new qualifications. I want us to think about learning - what it means for each each of us and how it gives purpose to our lives.
We learn throughout our lives and each time we face new challenges, we take on new information, adapt our thinking and develop new skills. We learn how to build our identity as we emerge from teenage years, we learn relationships with our partners, to be successful parents and to face the horizon of our life.
The workplace is a specific context of learning and for those who are employed, valuable learning is embedded in the contribution of work effort. This is especially true for the so-called 'smart economy'. In fact, economies of the kind envisioned in the government plan are better described by the on-going process 'learning' rather than the end-state 'smart' or 'knowledgeable'.
This is not just a flaw in the language it is much more fundamental. People who find themselves unemployed are often people who know how to learn but who find themselves without a meaningful context for learning. This is the tragedy.
Some knowledge economy rhetoric does them no service - to talk about the need to upskill people to a condition of 'smartness' is to completely miss the point of how knowledge contributes to economic growth. If, on the other hand, we think process then we can make a much more plausible case - that learning itself can lead to innovation and contribute to economic and social well-being.
So when we ask "what can the City of Dublin do to ensure future employment and well-being of its people?" I suggest that we create a vision of a Dublin City of Learning.
What we mean is a city where learning is regarded as an activity rather than a commodity, and where we strive to provide contexts and meaning for everyone so that the learning process is nurtured and sustained through unemployment, retirement or other circumstances of disengagement.
There are many ways in which this vision can be brought about, and there are many challenges to be overcome. This submission does not provide all the answers. But if we get our thinking right from the start, if we challenge flawed policies and if we genuinly consider what it means to learn then we will have made a good first step. After all, it's the process that matters, this is what will get us there in the end.
As to an action that Dublin City Council can lead and support I suggest the following:
Dublin City of Learning Web Site
The best of the Internet is socially constructed. This process of construction is itself a learning process and for the millions of authors of Wikipedia, writers of blogs and contributors to Facebook, web boards and Twitter, participation in the social Internet brings meaning and purpose to their lives.
We are a city - not just buildings and spaces but a city of people.
With some basic infrastructure and initial support we could create a new structure for Dublin in the on-line world. Not like the institutional web sites that abound but something akin to the social spaces that we all enjoy.
Everyone who lives in, or has an interest in the city will be encouraged to contribute. Some can contribute technical expertise, some as editors and lead writers, some as teachers to help those who need support with the technical and writing skills. We will need projects to develop new areas of interest by theme or location, we will need to capture the stories of our city, install a photographic collection, display the paintings of our citizens and celebrate the achievements of all our sports people.
If we do this we will have the best resource ever to advertise the experience of Dublin to those who wish to visit, we will create a valuable resource for future generations but above all, we will be Dublin City of Learning.
Labels:
Dublin,
Emer Costello,
Lord Mayor of Dublin,
Social Internet
Saturday, November 28, 2009
On Motivation and Learning
Much of the scholarship on adult learning can be summarised in the following statement:
Adult's learn what they want to learn and what they find useful and applicable to their life experience.
In contrast, young people, certainly up to teenage years, are happy to learn what is put before them. Adults, on the other hand, will discriminate and select when it comes to learning.
It stands to reason therefore that motivation for learning is an important topic in adult education. Motivation theories address the question of why we learn as distinct from cognitive theories that try to explain how we learn.
When we use the term "motivation" in everyday life it can mean several different things - we often say "the football team came out motivated by the half-time talk" or such a person is a "motivational speaker". In these examples we see motivation as a kind of energy or mind set that can be triggered for short intervals of time. Another meaning we have for motivation suggests a long term quality, a propensity to achieve - one who is "motivated to get to the top". But motivation is not always directed at achievement - when a crime is committed we know that every good detective looks for opportunity and motive in suspects.
One drawback of everyday language is that we tend to think of motivation in the singular - we look for one reason for a particular action. In reality, motivation is a complex matter; there is usually a mix of influences and mindset; circumstance and chance all play their part.
What then of motivation and learning? I suggest that we need to consider two types of factors - those that predispose a person to take on a learning project and opportunity factors connected with the circumstances and conditions of learning.
Let's take a look at predisposition. If you ask adult returners, in a college for example, you will often hear people describe that they had been thinking about doing a course for a long time. In my research (on adult's learning computer skills) I hear phrases such as: "I've always wanted to go back to school" or "I've been thinking about doing something about this for many years". So it's clear that many people nurture a desire for learning. What's interesting is that many people report that they were so inclined over a long period of time. I think of this as a kind of priming. It stands to reason that even when so 'primed' some people will act to learn and others will remain with an unfulfilled desire.
So, the other set of factors come into play - these are connected with the opportunity. "I was in the supermarket and I seen the sign for the course and the two girls at the stand were very helpful" this is how one of my informants describes a moment of opportunity. At this point a person may (not necessarily as a conscious process) weigh up all the factors and ask questions such as:
What will I get from this?
How hard will it be?
How will other people regard my actions?
Will I have the time, space, money, support etc.?
This is the complex of motivation. And here I am just describing one decision point. Even when people start a course the questioning continues throughout.
As I said Adult's learn what they want to learn and what they find useful and applicable to their life experience.
Adult's learn what they want to learn and what they find useful and applicable to their life experience.
In contrast, young people, certainly up to teenage years, are happy to learn what is put before them. Adults, on the other hand, will discriminate and select when it comes to learning.
It stands to reason therefore that motivation for learning is an important topic in adult education. Motivation theories address the question of why we learn as distinct from cognitive theories that try to explain how we learn.
When we use the term "motivation" in everyday life it can mean several different things - we often say "the football team came out motivated by the half-time talk" or such a person is a "motivational speaker". In these examples we see motivation as a kind of energy or mind set that can be triggered for short intervals of time. Another meaning we have for motivation suggests a long term quality, a propensity to achieve - one who is "motivated to get to the top". But motivation is not always directed at achievement - when a crime is committed we know that every good detective looks for opportunity and motive in suspects.
One drawback of everyday language is that we tend to think of motivation in the singular - we look for one reason for a particular action. In reality, motivation is a complex matter; there is usually a mix of influences and mindset; circumstance and chance all play their part.
What then of motivation and learning? I suggest that we need to consider two types of factors - those that predispose a person to take on a learning project and opportunity factors connected with the circumstances and conditions of learning.
Let's take a look at predisposition. If you ask adult returners, in a college for example, you will often hear people describe that they had been thinking about doing a course for a long time. In my research (on adult's learning computer skills) I hear phrases such as: "I've always wanted to go back to school" or "I've been thinking about doing something about this for many years". So it's clear that many people nurture a desire for learning. What's interesting is that many people report that they were so inclined over a long period of time. I think of this as a kind of priming. It stands to reason that even when so 'primed' some people will act to learn and others will remain with an unfulfilled desire.
So, the other set of factors come into play - these are connected with the opportunity. "I was in the supermarket and I seen the sign for the course and the two girls at the stand were very helpful" this is how one of my informants describes a moment of opportunity. At this point a person may (not necessarily as a conscious process) weigh up all the factors and ask questions such as:
What will I get from this?
How hard will it be?
How will other people regard my actions?
Will I have the time, space, money, support etc.?
This is the complex of motivation. And here I am just describing one decision point. Even when people start a course the questioning continues throughout.
As I said Adult's learn what they want to learn and what they find useful and applicable to their life experience.
Tuesday, November 24, 2009
Problem Based Learning: The Apprentice?
Those that know me will know that I am a fan of Problem-Based Learning, usually referred to as PBL.
Ireland's version of "The Apprentice" is being aired on TV3 and watched by many including our household. The idea is that contestants are fighting it out to get a big job as apprentice to Bill Cullen (Ireland's best known, self-made entrepreneur).
For each episode the contestants are asked to complete authentic tasks usually with a sales or design element.
We get to see them work in groups, select a project manager, set goals, solve problems and think and act creatively. As television it's quite absorbing and informative and there is plenty of learning taking place, for the contestants and vicariously, for the the viewers.
When I first watched these sequences I was impressed to see a good instructional approach transferred to television.
However, all this is let down by the final sequences of each programme. These scenes take place in the boardroom where groups are asked to report on the process.
Bill is naturally a good teacher and in fairness, he tries to balance his negative criticism with supportive comments.
But the show's structure calls for an inevitable reduction by one contestant (you're fired!) each week. This leads to verbal abuse, recriminations and outright humiliation for some of the participants.
All this makes great television but the message is too savage for genuine learning and personal development.
Most importantly, Bill looks for "the creative spark" in the actions and thinking of the contestants.
Genuine creative thinking arises when we relax our learned inhibitions - creativity requires a safe and secure foundation (see Bowlby, for example).
Faced with the prospect of ridicule on national television few people are going to genuinely take a risk and truly express novel thinking.
We need innovation in the workplace - to nurture innovation we need to provide 'safe spaces' for exploration - we also need to encourage learning from failure as well as from success.
Ireland's version of "The Apprentice" is being aired on TV3 and watched by many including our household. The idea is that contestants are fighting it out to get a big job as apprentice to Bill Cullen (Ireland's best known, self-made entrepreneur).
For each episode the contestants are asked to complete authentic tasks usually with a sales or design element.
We get to see them work in groups, select a project manager, set goals, solve problems and think and act creatively. As television it's quite absorbing and informative and there is plenty of learning taking place, for the contestants and vicariously, for the the viewers.
When I first watched these sequences I was impressed to see a good instructional approach transferred to television.
However, all this is let down by the final sequences of each programme. These scenes take place in the boardroom where groups are asked to report on the process.
Bill is naturally a good teacher and in fairness, he tries to balance his negative criticism with supportive comments.
But the show's structure calls for an inevitable reduction by one contestant (you're fired!) each week. This leads to verbal abuse, recriminations and outright humiliation for some of the participants.
All this makes great television but the message is too savage for genuine learning and personal development.
Most importantly, Bill looks for "the creative spark" in the actions and thinking of the contestants.
Genuine creative thinking arises when we relax our learned inhibitions - creativity requires a safe and secure foundation (see Bowlby, for example).
Faced with the prospect of ridicule on national television few people are going to genuinely take a risk and truly express novel thinking.
We need innovation in the workplace - to nurture innovation we need to provide 'safe spaces' for exploration - we also need to encourage learning from failure as well as from success.
Wednesday, November 18, 2009
My Philosophical Development by Bertrand Russell
I am reading a wonderful book called My Philosophical Development by Bertrand Russell - I picked up a 1959 first edition in a wonderful second hand bookshop, Trinity Books in Carrick On Shannon. This is like a beginners guide to Russell by himself and, in it he traces his thinking down through the years.
There is a particularly poignant section where Russell reproduces copies of his notes from his teenage years. He writes (p280): Just before and just after my 16th birthday, I wrote down my beliefs and unbeliefs, using Greek letters and phonetic spelling for the purposes of concealment.
What Russell was at pains to conceal at this young age were his doubts about religion and the existence of God. What troubled him was not necessarily the social consequences but rather, the intellectual consequences.
Here is is entry of April 29th 1988:
Seventy one years later, in 1959 the following occurred: Allen and Unwin published the book, Russell recorded a television interview included below and (of no relevance to Russell) I was born.
Fifty years after that, as a consequence of my bookshop brousing in Leitrim, I reproduce the thoughts of a teenager writing in a personal blog: I have made a vow to follow reason.
Yes you did Bertrand, yes indeed!
There is a particularly poignant section where Russell reproduces copies of his notes from his teenage years. He writes (p280): Just before and just after my 16th birthday, I wrote down my beliefs and unbeliefs, using Greek letters and phonetic spelling for the purposes of concealment.
What Russell was at pains to conceal at this young age were his doubts about religion and the existence of God. What troubled him was not necessarily the social consequences but rather, the intellectual consequences.
Here is is entry of April 29th 1988:
In all things I have made a vow to follow reason, not the instincts inherited partly from my ancestors and gained gradually by selection and partly due to my education. How absurd it would be to follow these in the questions of right and wrong. For as I observed before, the inherited part can only be principles leading to the preservation of the species, or of that particular section of the species to which I belong. The part due to education is good or bad according to the individual education. Yet this inner voice, this God-given conscience which made Bloody Mary burn the Protestants, this is what we reasonable beings are to follow. I think this idea mad, and I endeavour to go by reason as far as possible. What I take as my ideal is that which ultimately produces greatest happiness of greatest number. Then I can apply reason to find out the course more conducive to this...Not bad for a sixteen year old.
Seventy one years later, in 1959 the following occurred: Allen and Unwin published the book, Russell recorded a television interview included below and (of no relevance to Russell) I was born.
Fifty years after that, as a consequence of my bookshop brousing in Leitrim, I reproduce the thoughts of a teenager writing in a personal blog: I have made a vow to follow reason.
Yes you did Bertrand, yes indeed!
Sunday, November 15, 2009
Weekend in Rota d'Imagna
We came accross Hotel Miramonti which is about 40 minutes from Bergamo up in the mountains.
The town was called Rota d'Imagna and it is very pleasently located high up in the alpine foothills.
This was a great weekend - really enjoyable with just the four of us. Maire and I were especially keen to practice our Italian. But we had little opportunity as most people were so nice and of course, wanted to speak English to us.
Jim was keen to practice his photography skills and indeed he took some very beautiful pictures.
It's great just to go somewhere quiet. Rota d'Imagna was a quiet town.
Pictures are from the town of Bergamo.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)




